Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dycom Industries, Inc.
How Dycom Industries, Inc. stacks up
DY · against 2,439 other Industrials companies
Profitability
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,184 of 2,440 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score244 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including DY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 6.1% vs peer median 7.7%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.3% vs peer median 7.1%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 70% of peers. Return on assets: 5.0% vs peer median 3.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 2,323 reported | 7.3% | 7.1% | 51% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 2,434 reported | 6.1% | 7.7% | 40% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 2,336 reported | 5.0% | 3.1% | 70% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 2,300 reported | 19.2% | 8.0% | 86% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 2,460 reported | 20.5% | 25.8% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.9B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 13.8B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 100 | 89 | |
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 51M MYR (≈$11M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1,184 | 4.2B CNY (≈$591M) | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score