Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dycom Industries, Inc.
How Dycom Industries, Inc. stacks up
DY · against 407 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #161 of 408 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score61 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including DY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.5% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 397 reported | 4.8% | 4.2% | 59% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 411 reported | 9.7% | 7.7% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 186 reported | 6.8% | 4.0% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 395 reported | 30.0% | 37.2% | 38% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 3 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 4 | 6.28T KRW (≈$4.5B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 4 | 28.3B HKD (≈$3.6B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 158 | 69.3B CNY (≈$9.7B) | 61 | 71 | |
| 158 | 3.7B USD | 61 | 64 | |
| 158 | 7.4B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 161 | 3.2B CHF (≈$3.7B) | 60 | 49 | |
| 161 | 6.9B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 161 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.7B) | 60 | 44 | |
| 161 | 5.7B USD | 60 | 49 | |
| 161 | 8.6B EUR (≈$9.5B) | 60 | 45 | |
| 166 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 59 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score