Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
How Driven Brands Holdings Inc. stacks up
DRVN · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #537 of 1,553 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including DRVN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DRVN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DRVN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 8.8% | 4.4% | 82% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 10.4% | 8.8% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 7.2% | 6.1% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 44.8% | 57.2% | 41% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DRVN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 537 | 35.3B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 65 | 50 | |
| 537 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score