Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
How Driven Brands Holdings Inc. stacks up
DRVN · against 435 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #162 of 436 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score48 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including DRVN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DRVN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DRVN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 433 reported | 8.8% | 5.6% | 81% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 444 reported | 10.4% | 9.6% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | 7.2% | 6.8% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 435 reported | 44.8% | 54.7% | 42% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DRVN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 162 | 69.3B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 65 | 57 | |
| 162 | 35.3B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 65 | 50 | |
| 162 | 2.6B USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 162 | 2.5B GBP (≈$3.3B) | 65 | 68 | |
| 162 | 1.9B USD | 65 | 55 | |
| 162 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.6B) | 65 | 53 | |
| 171 | 12.1B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 64 | 60 | |
| 171 | 378.4B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 64 | 68 | |
| 171 | 252.6B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 64 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score