Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Domino's Pizza, Inc.
How Domino's Pizza, Inc. stacks up
DPZ · against 170 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #109 of 171 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score22 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including DPZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 6.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DPZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DPZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 171 reported | 4.5% | 5.9% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 147 reported | 6.2% | 6.9% | 47% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 170 reported | 4.3% | 7.7% | 37% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DPZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 1 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 4 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 4 | 524.8B INR (≈$6.3B) | 98 | 60 | |
| 105 | 62.0B DKK (≈$9.3B) | 52 | 55 | |
| 107 | 5.9B USD | 51 | 49 | |
| 107 | 5.9B GBP (≈$7.6B) | 51 | 50 | |
| 109 | 58.7B HKD (≈$7.5B) | 50 | 67 | |
| 109 | 10.7B USD | 50 | 50 | |
| 109 | 155.0B SEK (≈$15.5B) | 50 | 71 | |
| 109 | 271.2B MXN (≈$14.6B) | 50 | 70 | |
| 113 | 53.8B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 49 | 67 | |
| 113 | 1.46T JPY (≈$9.9B) | 49 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score