Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BRP Inc.
How BRP Inc. stacks up
DOO · against 302 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #118 of 303 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including DOO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 14.3% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DOO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DOO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 301 reported | 1.8% | 5.5% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 11.2% | 9.7% | 61% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 139 reported | 18.9% | 6.3% | 96% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 305 reported | Not reported | 43.9% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DOO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 112 | 2.5B GBP (≈$3.3B) | 65 | 68 | |
| 112 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score