Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DNUT · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #780 of 802 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 3
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)81 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including DNUT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DNUT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 2.04× | 0.44× | 8% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 1.25 | 0.32 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 0.36× | 1.53× | 1% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 776 | 244M USD | 3 | 21 | |
| 777 | 1.5B USD | 3 | 51 | |
| 778 | 13.1B USD | 3 | 45 | |
| 779 | 4.8B HKD (≈$616M) | 3 | 32 | |
| 780 | 567M USD | 3 | 16 | |
| 781 | 2.3B CNY (≈$326M) | 3 | 42 | |
| 782 | 2.8B CNY (≈$399M) | 2 | 16 | |
| 783 | 2.4B USD | 2 | 25 | |
| 784 | 22M EUR (≈$24M) | 2 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score