Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dorchester Minerals, L.P.
How Dorchester Minerals, L.P. stacks up
DMLP · against 108 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #30 of 109 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including DMLP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 4.5% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.7% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 77% of peers. Revenue growth: 13.9% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DMLP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DMLP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 111 reported | 13.9% | 0.3% | 77% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 73 reported | 4.5% | -20.3% | 68% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 108 reported | 7.7% | -0.8% | 71% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DMLP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 98 | |
| 5 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 95 | 38 | |
| 26 | 26.1B NOK (≈$2.5B) | 72 | 51 | |
| 27 | 2.2B USD | 71 | 60 | |
| 27 | 2.1B USD | 71 | 76 | |
| 27 | 755M USD | 71 | 41 | |
| 30 | 1.4B USD | 70 | 80 | |
| 30 | 1.4B CAD (≈$986M) | 70 | 67 | |
| 32 | 15.1B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 69 | 63 | |
| 33 | 11.7B MYR (≈$2.6B) | 68 | 55 | |
| 34 | 26.14T IDR (≈$1.6B) | 67 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score