Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DMAC · against 479 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #114 of 480 · scores higher than 76% of peers · safety percentile 80
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)61 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including DMAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DMAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 447 reported | 0.00× | 0.18× | 92% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 459 reported | 0.97 | 0.41 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 475 reported | 6.72× | 2.86× | 78% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 2 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 3 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 455M USD | 99 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2.7B CNY (≈$375M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 110 | 63.5B JPY (≈$432M) | 81 | 57 | |
| 111 | 143.3B JPY (≈$975M) | 81 | 61 | |
| 112 | 109.3B JPY (≈$743M) | 81 | 76 | |
| 113 | 3.9B CNY (≈$549M) | 80 | 61 | |
| 114 | 539M USD | 80 | 33 | |
| 115 | 3.8B CNY (≈$528M) | 80 | 59 | |
| 116 | 530M USD | 80 | 23 | |
| 117 | 582M AUD (≈$384M) | 79 | 74 | |
| 118 | 533M USD | 79 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score