Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DLTR · against 68 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #47 of 69 · scores higher than 32% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including DLTR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DLTR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 69 reported | 2.24× | 0.82× | 13% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 68 reported | 0.72 | 0.34 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 65 reported | 1.13× | 1.14× | 48% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 212.7B CNY (≈$29.8B) | 97 | 72 | |
| 2 | 118.9B CNY (≈$16.7B) | 83 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 82 | 71 | |
| 4 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 82 | 81 | |
| 5 | 293.3B CNY (≈$41.1B) | 81 | 54 | |
| 43 | 28.1B EUR (≈$30.9B) | 23 | 51 | |
| 44 | 18.2B USD | 23 | 43 | |
| 45 | 12.9B USD | 21 | 62 | |
| 46 | 44.8B EUR (≈$49.3B) | 21 | 48 | |
| 47 | 25.2B USD | 21 | 65 | |
| 48 | 47.3B USD | 21 | 47 | |
| 49 | 21.1B EUR (≈$23.2B) | 20 | 54 | |
| 50 | 291.8B MXN (≈$15.8B) | 20 | 49 | |
| 51 | 17.4B GBP (≈$22.6B) | 19 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score