Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DKL · against 130 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #123 of 131 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 7
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including DKL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DKL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 130 reported | Not reported | 0.49× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 129 reported | 0.45 | 0.48 | 52% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 130 reported | 0.96× | 1.44× | 26% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 4 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 5 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 119 | 3.5B USD | 9 | 16 | |
| 120 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 9 | 57 | |
| 121 | 3.8B USD | 8 | 21 | |
| 122 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 7 | 4 | |
| 123 | 3.1B USD | 7 | 39 | |
| 124 | 2.0B USD | 6 | 15 | |
| 125 | 5.9B CAD (≈$4.3B) | 5 | 26 | |
| 126 | 4.9B USD | 5 | 42 | |
| 127 | 4.3B USD | 4 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score