Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Delek Logistics Partners, LP
How Delek Logistics Partners, LP stacks up
DKL · against 187 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Growth
77/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #60 of 188 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score26 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including DKL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 1.5% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 90% of peers. Revenue growth: 30.3% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DKL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DKL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 192 reported | 30.3% | 7.9% | 86% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 141 reported | 1.5% | 2.9% | 48% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 186 reported | 4.4% | 1.0% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DKL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 56 | 4.3B USD | 78 | 47 | |
| 56 | 53.9B USD | 78 | 42 | |
| 56 | 12.6B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 56 | 4.3B USD | 78 | 60 | |
| 60 | 3.1B USD | 77 | 39 | |
| 60 | 1.8B USD | 77 | 61 | |
| 62 | 4.7B USD | 76 | 40 | |
| 62 | 6.6B USD | 76 | 28 | |
| 62 | 3.9B USD | 76 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score