Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dine Brands Global, Inc.
How Dine Brands Global, Inc. stacks up
DIN · against 584 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #183 of 585 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score50 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including DIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 79% of peers. Return on assets: 0.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 86% of peers. Operating margin: 16.3% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 556 reported | 7.2% | 5.3% | 59% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 583 reported | 16.3% | 5.1% | 91% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 555 reported | 0.4% | 2.3% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 543 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 586 reported | 39.5% | 27.2% | 69% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 178 | 6.2B CNY (≈$867M) | 58 | 64 | |
| 178 | 87.6B JPY (≈$596M) | 58 | 62 | |
| 178 | 70.7B INR (≈$848M) | 58 | 47 | |
| 183 | 118.6B JPY (≈$807M) | 57 | 66 | |
| 183 | 447M USD | 57 | 29 | |
| 183 | 327M GBP (≈$425M) | 57 | 46 | |
| 183 | 618M NZD (≈$371M) | 57 | 49 | |
| 183 | 57.1B INR (≈$685M) | 57 | 52 | |
| 188 | 2.9B CNY (≈$403M) | 56 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score