Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dine Brands Global, Inc.
How Dine Brands Global, Inc. stacks up
DIN · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
22/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #301 of 356 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score31 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including DIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -82.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 62% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 6.4% | 5.9% | 53% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -82.2% | 6.2% | 4% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 1.4% | 4.1% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 291 | 1.4B USD | 24 | 44 | |
| 299 | 40.6B USD | 23 | 61 | |
| 299 | 5.2B USD | 23 | 50 | |
| 301 | 365M USD | 22 | 20 | |
| 301 | 447M USD | 22 | 29 | |
| 301 | 9.8B USD | 22 | 47 | |
| 304 | 77.5B USD | 21 | 26 | |
| 304 | 1.5B USD | 21 | 45 | |
| 304 | 4.2B USD | 21 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score