Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to DHT Holdings, Inc.
How DHT Holdings, Inc. stacks up
DHT · against 400 other Energy companies
Profitability
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #36 of 401 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score43 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including DHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin and return on assets, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 12.0% vs peer median 9.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 93% of peers. Operating margin: 45.1% vs peer median 11.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 93% of peers. Return on assets: 13.2% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DHT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 383 reported | 12.0% | 9.3% | 59% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 398 reported | 45.1% | 11.7% | 93% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 391 reported | 13.2% | 4.4% | 93% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 384 reported | 39.2% | 10.5% | 95% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 405 reported | 76.7% | 33.2% | 91% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DHT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 6.33T SAR (≈$1.71T) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 32 | 64.6B THB (≈$1.8B) | 92 | 78 | |
| 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score