Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DG · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #358 of 802 · scores higher than 55% of peers · safety percentile 55
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including DG · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker debt / equity and current ratio than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 1.70× | 0.44× | 11% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.23 | 0.32 | 63% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.21× | 1.53× | 35% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 354 | 1.8B MYR (≈$407M) | 56 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 355 | 21.9B INR (≈$263M) | 56 | 58 |
| 356 | 1.7B CNY (≈$242M) | 56 | 22 |
| 357 | 847M HKD (≈$108M) | 56 | 75 |
| 358 | 28.8B USD | 55 | 62 |
| 359 | 7.6B EUR (≈$8.4B) | 55 | 56 |
| 360 | 1.90T CLP (≈$2.1B) | 55 | 46 |
| 361 | 569.5B INR (≈$6.8B) | 55 | 63 |
| 362 | 5.8B CNY (≈$816M) | 55 | 38 |