Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Douglas Emmett, Inc.
How Douglas Emmett, Inc. stacks up
DEI · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
26/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #156 of 180 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including DEI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.2% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 0.8% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DEI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DEI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 0.8% | 5.9% | 25% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | -30.8% | 13.9% | 21% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | -0.2% | 4.8% | 24% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DEI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 151 | Unavailable | 28 | 33 | |
| 151 | 2.1B USD | 28 | 32 | |
| 155 | 2.4B USD | 27 | 52 | |
| 156 | 633M USD | 26 | 33 | |
| 156 | 2.0B USD | 26 | 24 | |
| 156 | 759M USD | 26 | 35 | |
| 159 | Unavailable | 25 | 40 | |
| 159 | 1.5B USD | 25 | 35 | |
| 159 | 536M USD | 25 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score