Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dillard's, Inc.
How Dillard's, Inc. stacks up
DDS · against 186 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #63 of 187 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including DDS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.7% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.2% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DDS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DDS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 7.2% | 5.0% | 74% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 9.7% | 8.5% | 61% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 103 reported | 6.7% | 5.8% | 60% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 185 reported | 22.3% | 32.7% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DDS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 6.99T KRW (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 58 | 155.0B SEK (≈$15.5B) | 62 | 71 | |
| 60 | 7.29T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 61 | 65 | |
| 60 | 101.0B HKD (≈$12.9B) | 61 | 58 | |
| 60 | 8.0B USD | 61 | 52 | |
| 63 | 9.5B USD | 60 | 66 | |
| 63 | 9.4B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 63 | 5.1B USD | 60 | 59 | |
| 63 | 5.2B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 67 | 16.1B USD | 59 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score