Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Datadog, Inc.
How Datadog, Inc. stacks up
DDOG · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
19/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,343 of 1,667 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including DDOG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 19?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 80% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 72% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.2% vs peer median 2.2%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 63% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DDOG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DDOG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 0.2% | 2.3% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 0.1% | 4.3% | 20% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 1.4% | 2.7% | 37% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 5.5% | 33.4% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DDOG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,343 | 201.2B TWD (≈$6.2B) | 19 | 60 | |
| 1,343 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score