Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DBX · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,580 of 1,698 · scores higher than 7% of peers · safety percentile 7
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including DBX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DBX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | Not reported | 0.26× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.63 | 0.84 | 65% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.07× | 1.83× | 15% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,576 | 1.2B AUD (≈$766M) | 7 | 41 | |
| 1,577 | 16.8B TWD (≈$522M) | 7 | 25 | |
| 1,578 | 3.4B USD | 7 | 54 | |
| 1,579 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 7 | 20 | |
| 1,580 | 7.6B USD | 7 | 55 | |
| 1,581 | 912M TWD (≈$28M) | 7 | 11 | |
| 1,582 | 1.23T KRW (≈$884M) | 7 | 24 | |
| 1,583 | 13.6B TWD (≈$420M) | 7 | 21 | |
| 1,584 | 605.4B TWD (≈$18.8B) | 7 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score