Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated
How Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated stacks up
DBD · against 467 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #35 of 468 · scores higher than 92% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including DBD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.9% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 91% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.2% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 94% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DBD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DBD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | 5.4% | 2.4% | 81% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 16.8% | 4.5% | 94% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 177 reported | 11.2% | 3.2% | 89% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 463 reported | 51.1% | 31.8% | 77% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DBD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 30 | 1.4B USD | 93 | 72 | |
| 35 | 13.4B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 92 | 60 | |
| 35 | 32.2B TWD (≈$999M) | 92 | 64 | |
| 35 | 90.1B INR (≈$1.1B) | 92 | 76 | |
| 35 | 1.9B USD | 92 | 59 | |
| 35 | 3.1B USD | 92 | 84 | |
| 40 | 4.12T KRW (≈$3.0B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 40 | 69.9B TWD (≈$2.2B) | 91 | 55 | |
| 40 | 22.4B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 91 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score