Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Darling Ingredients Inc.
How Darling Ingredients Inc. stacks up
DAR · against 108 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
72/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #26 of 109 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including DAR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 72?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 12.0% vs peer median 8.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.5% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.1% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DAR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 105 reported | 6.8% | 5.0% | 78% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 109 reported | 9.0% | 8.8% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 10.4% | 6.9% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 102 reported | 62.0% | 41.9% | 78% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DAR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 2 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 3 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 4 | 5.5B USD | 88 | 84 | |
| 5 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 87 | 36 | |
| 23 | 13.1B USD | 75 | 45 | |
| 24 | 785.5B JPY (≈$5.3B) | 73 | 62 | |
| 24 | 2.33T JPY (≈$15.8B) | 73 | 68 | |
| 26 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 72 | 80 | |
| 26 | 8.5B USD | 72 | 61 | |
| 28 | 291.8B MXN (≈$15.8B) | 70 | 49 | |
| 29 | 31.5B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 69 | 75 | |
| 29 | 6.5B USD | 69 | 37 | |
| 31 | 2.44T JPY (≈$16.6B) | 68 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score