Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DAR · against 108 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #90 of 109 · scores higher than 18% of peers · safety percentile 15
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including DAR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 108 reported | 0.79× | 0.50× | 34% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 105 reported | 1.05 | 0.31 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 102 reported | 1.56× | 1.42× | 62% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 2 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 3 | 37.3B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 4 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 5 | 55.6B CNY (≈$7.8B) | 83 | 57 | |
| 86 | 392.1B THB (≈$11.0B) | 19 | 46 | |
| 87 | 114.2B MXN (≈$6.2B) | 18 | 57 | |
| 88 | 6.9B USD | 16 | 36 | |
| 89 | 15.2B USD | 15 | 36 | |
| 90 | 8.5B USD | 15 | 61 | |
| 91 | 54.1B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 14 | 41 | |
| 92 | 4.9B USD | 13 | 64 | |
| 93 | 35.0B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 12 | 13 | |
| 94 | 7.6B USD | 11 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score