Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DAO · against 197 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #190 of 198 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including DAO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | DAO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 192 reported | 1.0% | 4.7% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 198 reported | 1.7% | 9.4% | 4% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 69 reported | Not reported | 7.2% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 188 reported | Not reported | 51.8% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.73T IDR (≈$1.8B) | 98 | 60 | |
| 2 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 2 | 57.07T IDR (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 4 | 24.2B HKD (≈$3.1B) | 95 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2.33T KRW (≈$1.7B) | 94 | 66 | |
| 186 | 2.1B USD | 15 | 16 | |
| 186 | 157.0B INR (≈$1.9B) | 15 | 51 | |
| 188 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 14 | 42 | |
| 189 | 314.6B INR (≈$3.8B) | 13 | 37 | |
| 190 | 2.4B USD | 11 | 41 | |
| 191 | 11.3B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 10 | 21 | |
| 192 | 12.7B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 9 | 15 | |
| 193 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 8 | 14 | |
| 194 | 11.6B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 4 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score