Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to China Yuchai International Limited
How China Yuchai International Limited stacks up
CYD · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #89 of 1,586 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including CYD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 83% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 15.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 87% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 74.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: 28.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CYD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CYD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 28.9% | 3.7% | 94% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | 74.4% | 4.1% | 87% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 15.4% | 4.3% | 83% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CYD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 89 | 12.9B SAR (≈$3.5B) | 94 | 62 | |
| 89 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score