Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CoreCivic, Inc.
How CoreCivic, Inc. stacks up
CXW · against 573 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #300 of 574 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score76 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CXW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker free cash flow yield than most Industrials peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.9% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CXW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CXW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 570 reported | 4.0% | 4.4% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 581 reported | 8.9% | 7.9% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 195 reported | 1.9% | 4.3% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 571 reported | 47.0% | 44.8% | 52% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CXW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 296 | 18.6B SEK (≈$1.9B) | 54 | 36 | |
| 296 | 1.6B EUR (≈$1.8B) | 54 | 62 | |
| 300 | 25.0B MYR (≈$5.5B) | 53 | 73 | |
| 300 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 53 | 58 | |
| 300 | 3.1B USD | 53 | 56 | |
| 300 | 271.6B INR (≈$3.3B) | 53 | 75 | |
| 300 | 2.7B GBP (≈$3.5B) | 53 | 50 | |
| 300 | 63.6B TRY (≈$1.9B) | 53 | 44 | |
| 306 | 21.1B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 52 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score