Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CXM · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #692 of 1,698 · scores higher than 59% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CXM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CXM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.08× | 0.26× | 70% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.77 | 0.84 | 54% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.55× | 1.83× | 38% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 688 | 4.6B CNY (≈$643M) | 60 | 58 | |
| 689 | 22.9B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 59 | 68 | |
| 690 | 57.0B TWD (≈$1.8B) | 59 | 57 | |
| 691 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 32 | |
| 692 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 48 | |
| 693 | 6.44T JPY (≈$43.8B) | 59 | 63 | |
| 694 | 611M USD | 59 | 26 | |
| 695 | 7.3B USD | 59 | 36 | |
| 696 | 9.6B TWD (≈$296M) | 59 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score