Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CXM · against 500 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #213 of 501 · scores higher than 58% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)58 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CXM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CXM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 487 reported | 0.08× | 0.22× | 71% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 482 reported | 0.77 | 0.79 | 51% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 496 reported | 1.55× | 1.83× | 38% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 209 | 5.6B CNY (≈$781M) | 60 | 28 | |
| 210 | 22.9B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 59 | 68 | |
| 211 | 57.0B TWD (≈$1.8B) | 59 | 57 | |
| 212 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 32 | |
| 213 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 48 | |
| 214 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 59 | 55 | |
| 215 | 8.3B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 59 | 31 | |
| 216 | 19.4B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 59 | 30 | |
| 217 | 1.8B USD | 59 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score