Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to California Water Service Group
How California Water Service Group stacks up
CWT · against 103 other Utilities companies of similar size
Growth
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #41 of 104 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CWT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Utilities peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -5.8% vs peer median 1.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.9% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 85% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 2.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CWT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 105 reported | 3.9% | 0.3% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 86 reported | -5.8% | 2.7% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 104 reported | 9.9% | 2.1% | 81% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CWT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 2 | 1.5B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 98 | 77 | |
| 4 | 1.6B GBP (≈$2.1B) | 97 | 52 | |
| 5 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 95 | 60 | |
| 36 | 5.1B USD | 69 | 50 | |
| 38 | 2.00T CLP (≈$2.2B) | 66 | 78 | |
| 38 | 2.8B USD | 66 | 57 | |
| 40 | 2.1B USD | 64 | 50 | |
| 41 | 3.0B USD | 63 | 44 | |
| 42 | 15.7B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 62 | 43 | |
| 42 | 5.4B USD | 62 | 56 | |
| 44 | 9.1B NZD (≈$5.4B) | 59 | 70 | |
| 44 | 10.0B BRL (≈$1.8B) | 59 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score