Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CWT · against 93 other Utilities companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #33 of 94 · scores higher than 66% of peers · safety percentile 45
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including CWT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CWT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 92 reported | 0.93× | 1.37× | 76% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 88 reported | 0.48 | 0.52 | 59% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 94 reported | 0.70× | 0.86× | 28% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 2 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 3 | 439M USD | 94 | 63 | |
| 4 | 440M USD | 94 | 76 | |
| 5 | 3.4B USD | 93 | 43 | |
| 29 | 8.4B USD | 53 | 43 | |
| 30 | 2.8B USD | 51 | 57 | |
| 31 | 29.4B USD | 48 | 57 | |
| 32 | 2.2B USD | 47 | 48 | |
| 33 | 3.0B USD | 45 | 44 | |
| 34 | 6.4B USD | 44 | 45 | |
| 35 | 5.3B USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 36 | 1.5B USD | 43 | 67 | |
| 37 | 46.9B USD | 43 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score