Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
How Casella Waste Systems, Inc. stacks up
CWST · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #200 of 446 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CWST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 90% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -48.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 78% of peers. Revenue growth: 13.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 91% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 20.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CWST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 13.6% | 8.4% | 67% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | -48.5% | 9.2% | 11% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 20.4% | 5.2% | 86% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CWST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 194 | 2.4B USD | 65 | 61 | |
| 194 | 1.5B USD | 65 | 38 | |
| 200 | 7.2B USD | 64 | 60 | |
| 200 | 89.4B USD | 64 | 57 | |
| 200 | 6.1B USD | 64 | 34 | |
| 203 | 553M USD | 63 | 72 | |
| 203 | 1.2B USD | 63 | 31 | |
| 205 | 9.9B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 205 | 3.9B USD | 62 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score