Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Camping World Holdings, Inc.
How Camping World Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CWH · against 478 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #255 of 479 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score61 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including CWH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 74% of peers. Operating margin: 2.8% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 65% of peers. Return on assets: 1.9% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.0% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CWH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 451 reported | 7.0% | 4.3% | 62% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 478 reported | 2.8% | 4.5% | 37% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 455 reported | 1.9% | 2.1% | 48% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 444 reported | -26.5% | 4.5% | 8% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 480 reported | 28.7% | 26.3% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CWH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 23.9B JPY (≈$162M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 255 | 389.8B KRW (≈$281M) | 33 | 65 | |
| 255 | 4.3B CNY (≈$608M) | 33 | 22 | |
| 255 | 242M AUD (≈$160M) | 33 | 49 | |
| 255 | 2.3B SEK (≈$225M) | 33 | 28 | |
| 255 | 307M USD | 33 | 27 | |
| 255 | 468M EUR (≈$514M) | 33 | 47 | |
| 255 | 503M SGD (≈$382M) | 33 | 58 | |
| 262 | 30.3B JPY (≈$206M) | 32 | 60 | |
| 262 | 44.6B JPY (≈$303M) | 32 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score