CWH Consumer CyclicalBeta data

Camping World Holdings, Inc.

$4.81-10.09%

Price as of close on Nov 3, 2026 · Financials updated Nov 3, 2026

Basics

Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Industry: Auto & Truck Dealerships
Country: United States
Market cap: 307.0M USD
Enterprise value: 4.0B USD
Full-time employees: 11,144

Overall health

Drawback: less profitable than most peersless profitable than peers
Drawback: growing more slowly than most peersgrowing more slowly than peers
Drawback: its shares are priced higher than most peers relative to what it earnspriced higher than peers for its earnings
Drawback: higher risk than most peers: its share price swings more than most peers’ (beta 2.27 vs a peer median of 0.63) and more debt relative to equity (9.37× vs a peer median of 0.46×)higher risk: bigger price swings (beta 2.27 vs peers 0.63) and more debt vs equity (9.37× vs peers 0.46×)

Ranks #1,320 of 1,502 consumer cyclical companies (bottom 13%)

See how it ranks against its peers

Worth knowing

Much more borrowing than peers. Debt is 9.4× equity vs a peer median of 0.5×.Debt is 9.4× equity vs peers 0.5×.
Debt is 9.4× shareholders' equity, against a peer median of 0.5×, among the highest 10% of its peer group.Debt is 9.4× shareholders' equity, vs peers 0.5×, among the highest 10% of its peer group.
Valuation signals disagree. Cheaper than 84% of peers on free cash flow, but only 0% on earnings.
Relative to its free cash flow, Camping World looks cheaper than 84% of peers; relative to its earnings, cheaper than only 0%. The valuation score blends the two, so look at which measure fits this business best.
Not profitable yet. Reported a loss over the last 12 months.
Camping World reported a net loss over the last twelve months, so earnings-based measures can't show it as cheap.
More volatile share price. Beta 2.27: tends to move more than the market.
Camping World's shares have swung more with the market than most peers' (beta 2.27, above the market's 1.0).

StockQuotient Score

27/ 100

Oct 5 26 → Nov 4 27 (+1)

Fundamentals: Yahoo Finance, not primary filings

Valuation

Is the price right?

39/100

Weak▼ 1 since Oct 27 close

3/3 inputs reported · High confidence

Why it changed since the Oct 27, 2026 close: Score 40 → 39

Share price +7.6%-3
Company's reported figures updated+2

Each step re-scores the company against its peers as they were on Oct 28, 2026; the parts add up to the change. Price effects on EBITDA yield are approximate.

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ Earnings yield
▼ EBITDA yield

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Sector-normalized EBITDA, earnings, and free cash flow yields.

Earnings yield-32.2%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsNegative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price30% base weight · Z-score -1.34Sector median: 0.0439 · MAD: 0.0329

EBITDA yield6.3%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported value50% base weight · Z-score -0.53Sector median: 0.0877 · MAD: 0.0461

Free cash flow yield16.3%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 months · operating cash flow − capital spendingReported value20% base weight · Z-score 1.86Sector median: 0.0614 · MAD: 0.0545

Other data (not scored)

Book yield80.0%

Yahoo FinanceReported valueInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.5650 · MAD: 0.3500

Growth

Is it growing?

33/100

Weak

2/3 inputs reported · Partial data

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ 3-yr revenue

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Revenue and earnings-per-share growth over one year, and revenue growth over three years.

Earnings per share growthUnavailable

Missing · left out of the score · no sector data, so not countedNot counted · remaining weights rescaledSector median: 0.0420 · MAD: 0.2537

3-year revenue growth-2.9%

Yahoo Finance · 3 fiscal years to Dec 2025Reported value33% base weight · Z-score -1.13Sector median: 0.0425 · MAD: 0.0636

Revenue growth4.4%

Yahoo Finance · fiscal year to Dec 2025Reported value33% base weight · Z-score 0.10Sector median: 0.0373 · MAD: 0.0653

Profitability

Does it earn well?

33/100

Weak

3/3 inputs reported · High confidence

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ Operating margin
▼ ROA

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Return on invested capital, operating margin, and return on assets.

Operating margin2.8%

Yahoo Finance · fiscal year to Dec 2025Reported value33% base weight · Z-score -0.78Sector median: 0.0638 · MAD: 0.0461

Return on assets1.9%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported value33% base weight · Z-score -0.54Sector median: 0.0331 · MAD: 0.0254

Return on invested capital7.0%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported value33% base weight · Z-score -0.05Sector median: 0.0733 · MAD: 0.0600

Other data (not scored)

Gross margin28.7%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported valueInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.3025 · MAD: 0.1399

Return on equity-26.5%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported valueInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.0746 · MAD: 0.0674

Risk

Debt, liquidity, price swings

Higher

Higher relative risk

3/3 inputs reported · High confidence

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ Beta
▼ Debt / equity
▼ Current ratio

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Relative to sector peers: 0 = lower relative risk · 1 = moderate · 2 = higher. Based on leverage, beta and liquidity.

Beta2.27

Yahoo Finance · 5-year monthly beta vs the marketOutlier capped at sector 5th/95th percentile33% base weight · Z-score -3.80Sector median: 0.6345 · MAD: 0.2980

Current ratio1.22×

Yahoo FinanceReported value33% base weight · Z-score -0.46Sector median: 1.4800 · MAD: 0.5570

Debt / equity9.37×

Yahoo FinanceOutlier capped at sector 5th/95th percentile33% base weight · Z-score -9.02Sector median: 0.4646 · MAD: 0.3556

Valuation, growth and profitability scores: higher is better. Risk: 0 is lower, 2 is higher. Risk is a relative proxy, not a bankruptcy probability. Scores depend on available sector peers.

Questions investors ask about Camping World

Is Camping World getting weaker?: Filing-by-filing changes are tracked only for companies that file with the US SEC. Its overall score is unchanged at 27/100 since Oct 28, 2026.
How is Camping World valued vs its peers?: Priced higher than most peers relative to what it earns. Valuation scores 39/100 against 1,612 consumer cyclical peers. Free cash flow yield 16.3% vs a peer median of 6.1% (stronger than 84% of peers).Free cash flow yield 16.3% vs peers 6.1% (stronger than 84% of peers). Earnings yield -32.2% vs a peer median of 4.4% (weaker than 100% of peers).Earnings yield -32.2% vs peers 4.4% (weaker than 100% of peers).
Is Camping World growing?: More slowly than most of its peers. Growth scores 33/100 against 1,612 consumer cyclical peers. 3-year revenue growth -2.9% vs a peer median of 4.3% (weaker than 79% of peers).3-year revenue growth -2.9% vs peers 4.3% (weaker than 79% of peers).
How profitable is Camping World?: Less profitable than most of its peers. Profitability scores 33/100 against 1,612 consumer cyclical peers. Operating margin 2.8% vs a peer median of 6.4% (weaker than 74% of peers).Operating margin 2.8% vs peers 6.4% (weaker than 74% of peers).
How risky is Camping World?: Higher risk relative to 1,612 consumer cyclical peers, judged on debt, liquidity and share-price swings. Beta 2.27 vs a peer median of 0.63 (weaker than 100% of peers).Beta 2.27 vs peers 0.63 (weaker than 100% of peers). A relative measure, not a bankruptcy probability.

Industry valuation context

Sector: Consumer Cyclical · 182 companies

Valuations in Consumer Cyclical are within their usual range since 2016.

36% of months since 2016 were valued lower than now.
15% of companies are in the most expensive fifth of their own price-to-sales history.
Over 24 months, company values +0% and earnings +10% (medians): prices and earnings moved broadly together.
Median price-to-sales is −55% vs the whole market, against a usual −41%.

2016Shaded: most expensive fifth of its range2026

Shown for Consumer Cyclical: too few Auto & Truck Dealerships companies have a long enough history of their own.

Financials

Detailed annual statements come from structured SEC filing data, which most US companies and some foreign filers provide. They aren’t available for this company yet.

CWH price history

Price history is added with the daily price update and will appear after the next one.

Similar companies

Sector leaderboards

Sanrio Company, Ltd.8136.T96/ 100

Track & Field Co S.A.TFCO4.SA92/ 100

Pop Mart International Group Limited9992.HK91/ 100

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…

Overall health

Drawback: less profitable than most peersless profitable than peers

Drawback: growing more slowly than most peersgrowing more slowly than peers

Drawback: its shares are priced higher than most peers relative to what it earnspriced higher than peers for its earnings

Drawback: higher risk than most peers: its share price swings more than most peers’ (beta 2.27 vs a peer median of 0.63) and more debt relative to equity (9.37× vs a peer median of 0.46×)higher risk: bigger price swings (beta 2.27 vs peers 0.63) and more debt vs equity (9.37× vs peers 0.46×)

Ranks #1,320 of 1,502 consumer cyclical companies (bottom 13%)

See how it ranks against its peers

Worth knowing

Much more borrowing than peers. Debt is 9.4× equity vs a peer median of 0.5×.Debt is 9.4× equity vs peers 0.5×.

Debt is 9.4× shareholders' equity, against a peer median of 0.5×, among the highest 10% of its peer group.Debt is 9.4× shareholders' equity, vs peers 0.5×, among the highest 10% of its peer group.

Valuation signals disagree. Cheaper than 84% of peers on free cash flow, but only 0% on earnings.

Relative to its free cash flow, Camping World looks cheaper than 84% of peers; relative to its earnings, cheaper than only 0%. The valuation score blends the two, so look at which measure fits this business best.

Not profitable yet. Reported a loss over the last 12 months.

Camping World reported a net loss over the last twelve months, so earnings-based measures can't show it as cheap.

More volatile share price. Beta 2.27: tends to move more than the market.

Camping World's shares have swung more with the market than most peers' (beta 2.27, above the market's 1.0).

Questions investors ask about Camping World

Is Camping World getting weaker?

Filing-by-filing changes are tracked only for companies that file with the US SEC. Its overall score is unchanged at 27/100 since Oct 28, 2026.

How is Camping World valued vs its peers?

Priced higher than most peers relative to what it earns. Valuation scores 39/100 against 1,612 consumer cyclical peers. Free cash flow yield 16.3% vs a peer median of 6.1% (stronger than 84% of peers).Free cash flow yield 16.3% vs peers 6.1% (stronger than 84% of peers). Earnings yield -32.2% vs a peer median of 4.4% (weaker than 100% of peers).Earnings yield -32.2% vs peers 4.4% (weaker than 100% of peers).

Is Camping World growing?

More slowly than most of its peers. Growth scores 33/100 against 1,612 consumer cyclical peers. 3-year revenue growth -2.9% vs a peer median of 4.3% (weaker than 79% of peers).3-year revenue growth -2.9% vs peers 4.3% (weaker than 79% of peers).

How profitable is Camping World?

Less profitable than most of its peers. Profitability scores 33/100 against 1,612 consumer cyclical peers. Operating margin 2.8% vs a peer median of 6.4% (weaker than 74% of peers).Operating margin 2.8% vs peers 6.4% (weaker than 74% of peers).

How risky is Camping World?

Higher risk relative to 1,612 consumer cyclical peers, judged on debt, liquidity and share-price swings. Beta 2.27 vs a peer median of 0.63 (weaker than 100% of peers).Beta 2.27 vs peers 0.63 (weaker than 100% of peers). A relative measure, not a bankruptcy probability.