Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
How Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CWAN · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
21/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,309 of 1,667 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including CWAN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 21?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.7% vs peer median 2.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 73% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWAN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CWAN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | -0.7% | 2.3% | 23% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 1.3% | 4.3% | 27% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | Not reported | 2.7% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 28.1% | 33.4% | 42% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CWAN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,309 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 21 | 49 | |
| 1,309 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score