Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cavco Industries, Inc.
How Cavco Industries, Inc. stacks up
CVCO · against 295 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
56/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #155 of 296 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score42 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CVCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -0.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 73% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CVCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CVCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 296 reported | 9.7% | 5.2% | 70% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 256 reported | -0.5% | 7.8% | 36% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 294 reported | 4.2% | 5.5% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CVCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 2 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 2 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 5 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 150 | 5.5B USD | 57 | 36 | |
| 150 | 2.9B USD | 57 | 60 | |
| 150 | 3.7B USD | 57 | 41 | |
| 155 | 4.5B AUD (≈$3.0B) | 56 | 54 | |
| 155 | 5.0B USD | 56 | 58 | |
| 155 | 7.7B USD | 56 | 68 | |
| 158 | 8.6B USD | 55 | 49 | |
| 158 | 5.5B USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 158 | 3.1B GBP (≈$4.0B) | 55 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score