Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Curbline Properties Corp.
How Curbline Properties Corp. stacks up
CURB · against 158 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #7 of 159 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including CURB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 81% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 57.9% vs peer median 11.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: 54.8% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 35.7% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CURB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CURB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 159 reported | 54.8% | 5.2% | 95% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 134 reported | 57.9% | 8.1% | 86% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 155 reported | 35.7% | 6.2% | 97% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CURB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.7B SAR (≈$1.8B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.4B SAR (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 3 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 97 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2.1B GBP (≈$2.7B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.1B SGD (≈$3.1B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 4 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 96 | 58 | |
| 7 | 3.3B USD | 95 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2.7B USD | 95 | 39 | |
| 9 | 17.5B MYR (≈$3.9B) | 93 | 84 | |
| 9 | 17.7B NOK (≈$1.7B) | 93 | 52 | |
| 9 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 93 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score