Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CubeSmart
How CubeSmart stacks up
CUBE · against 105 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #71 of 106 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CUBE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.3% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.2% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CUBE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CUBE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | 3.3% | 4.5% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 102 reported | 5.2% | 5.5% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 61 reported | 6.0% | 5.4% | 65% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | 25.8% | 62.6% | 10% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CUBE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 67 | |
| 3 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 4 | 880.1B JPY (≈$6.0B) | 84 | 64 | |
| 4 | 135.9B MXN (≈$7.3B) | 84 | 76 | |
| 67 | 15.9B USD | 40 | 49 | |
| 69 | 8.6B USD | 39 | 56 | |
| 69 | 11.7B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 71 | 10.1B AUD (≈$6.7B) | 38 | 54 | |
| 71 | 10.0B USD | 38 | 45 | |
| 73 | 11.3B USD | 37 | 44 | |
| 74 | 18.3B USD | 36 | 38 | |
| 75 | 8.7B USD | 35 | 77 | |
| 76 | 6.7B USD | 34 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score