Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CubeSmart
How CubeSmart stacks up
CUBE · against 175 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #112 of 176 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CUBE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.3% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.2% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CUBE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CUBE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 3.3% | 2.9% | 55% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 5.2% | 6.1% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 167 reported | 6.0% | 5.9% | 52% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 25.8% | 63.5% | 14% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CUBE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | Unavailable | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 86M USD | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 255M USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 109 | 8.6B USD | 39 | 56 | |
| 109 | 11.7B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 109 | 3.6B USD | 39 | 39 | |
| 112 | 26.3B USD | 38 | 41 | |
| 112 | 10.0B USD | 38 | 45 | |
| 112 | 384M USD | 38 | 43 | |
| 115 | 11.3B USD | 37 | 44 | |
| 116 | 18.3B USD | 36 | 38 | |
| 116 | 3.8B USD | 36 | 74 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score