Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CTSH · against 131 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 132 · scores higher than 81% of peers · safety percentile 66
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including CTSH · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CTSH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 125 reported | 0.14× | 0.33× | 69% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 128 reported | 0.85 | 1.16 | 68% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 130 reported | 2.18× | 1.64× | 71% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 4 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 22 | 353.3B CNY (≈$49.5B) | 69 | 64 | |
| 23 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 69 | 85 | |
| 24 | 137.6B CNY (≈$19.3B) | 69 | 68 | |
| 25 | 33.0B USD | 67 | 74 | |
| 26 | 28.8B USD | 66 | 70 | |
| 27 | 6.07T JPY (≈$41.3B) | 66 | 68 | |
| 28 | 538.8B TWD (≈$16.7B) | 65 | 63 | |
| 29 | 43.3B USD | 65 | 34 | |
| 30 | 33.2B USD | 64 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score