Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CTS Corporation
How CTS Corporation stacks up
CTS · against 470 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #148 of 471 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score48 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including CTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.1% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 3.8% | 2.4% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 475 reported | 7.1% | 4.6% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 175 reported | 5.1% | 3.5% | 64% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 31.9% | 32.4% | 49% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 69.0B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 140 | 396.8B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 69 | 54 | |
| 140 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score