Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CTS · against 473 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #163 of 474 · scores higher than 66% of peers · safety percentile 66
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)46 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including CTS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 461 reported | 0.16× | 0.23× | 61% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 455 reported | 0.99 | 0.82 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 470 reported | 2.61× | 1.87× | 69% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 159 | 13.8B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 67 | 54 | |
| 160 | 2.1B USD | 67 | 64 | |
| 161 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 67 | 35 | |
| 162 | 76.2B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 67 | 72 | |
| 163 | 1.8B USD | 66 | 63 | |
| 164 | 7.9B MYR (≈$1.7B) | 66 | 63 | |
| 165 | 174.5B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 66 | 72 | |
| 166 | 32.3B TWD (≈$1.0B) | 66 | 58 | |
| 167 | 2.3B USD | 65 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score