Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
How CTO Realty Growth, Inc. stacks up
CTO · against 759 other Real Estate companies
Profitability
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #316 of 760 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score76 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including CTO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 3.7% vs peer median 3.4%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 38.7% vs peer median 26.8%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 72% of peers. Return on assets: 3.2% vs peer median 2.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 739 reported | 3.7% | 3.4% | 56% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 728 reported | 38.7% | 26.8% | 60% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 741 reported | 3.2% | 2.1% | 72% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 721 reported | 8.5% | 5.2% | 70% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 763 reported | 74.6% | 53.9% | 77% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 310M USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 5 | 91.4B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 309 | 10.8B AUD (≈$7.2B) | 59 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score