Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Claritev Corporation
How Claritev Corporation stacks up
CTEV · against 1,335 other Healthcare companies
Profitability
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #863 of 1,336 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score134 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including CTEV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on assets: -5.9% vs peer median 1.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 63% of peers. Return on invested capital: 0.6% vs peer median 4.7%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 3.3% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTEV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTEV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,226 reported | 0.6% | 4.7% | 37% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,251 reported | 3.3% | 7.1% | 40% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,315 reported | -5.9% | 1.7% | 29% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,252 reported | Not reported | 3.2% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,394 reported | 73.0% | 45.9% | 80% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTEV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 321.5B INR (≈$3.9B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 174.8B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 97.3B INR (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 5 | 12.3B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 863 | 30.4B JPY (≈$206M) | 35 | 57 | |
| 863 | 62.7B JPY (≈$426M) | 35 | 40 | |
| 863 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 35 | 34 | |
| 863 | 1.7B USD | 35 | 35 | |
| 863 | 356M USD | 35 | 35 | |
| 863 | 31.3B TRY (≈$938M) | 35 | 50 | |
| 863 | 2.0B USD | 35 | 27 | |
| 863 | 79M EUR (≈$87M) | 35 | 25 | |
| 863 | 471M NZD (≈$282M) | 35 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score