Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CTEV · against 398 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #382 of 399 · scores higher than 4% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)42 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CTEV · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CTEV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 365 reported | Not reported | 0.19× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 383 reported | 0.94 | 0.45 | 24% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 391 reported | 0.99× | 3.03× | 9% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 4 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 5 | 455M USD | 99 | 53 | |
| 378 | 296M USD | 5 | 66 | |
| 379 | 222M GBP (≈$288M) | 5 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 13 |
| 380 | 3.7B CNY (≈$520M) | 5 | 42 |
| 381 | 423M USD | 5 | 29 |
| 382 | 356M USD | 4 | 35 |
| 383 | 486M USD | 4 | 16 |
| 384 | 684M USD | 4 |
| 385 | 377M USD | 3 | 29 |
| 386 | 487M USD | 3 | 29 |