Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cintas Corporation
How Cintas Corporation stacks up
CTAS · against 67 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #29 of 68 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CTAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.6% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 69% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 68 reported | 9.5% | 7.7% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 64 reported | 12.6% | 9.1% | 62% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 67 reported | 8.7% | 6.6% | 65% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 5 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 25 | 152.1B USD | 69 | 49 | |
| 26 | 57.0B USD | 65 | 58 | |
| 26 | 60.0B USD | 65 | 71 | |
| 26 | 101.3B USD | 65 | 65 | |
| 29 | 89.4B USD | 64 | 57 | |
| 30 | 47.9B EUR (≈$52.7B) | 63 | 56 | |
| 31 | 153.0B EUR (≈$168.3B) | 62 | 51 | |
| 31 | 60.7B GBP (≈$78.9B) | 62 | 48 | |
| 33 | 49.7B USD | 61 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score