Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Carriage Services, Inc.
How Carriage Services, Inc. stacks up
CSV · against 611 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #206 of 612 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score62 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including CSV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 87% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.2% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CSV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CSV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 604 reported | 8.2% | 3.5% | 81% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 623 reported | 11.3% | 8.7% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | -4.0% | 8.0% | 17% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 605 reported | 51.3% | 62.2% | 39% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CSV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 206 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 66 | 83 | |
| 206 | 3.7B CNY (≈$525M) | 66 | 59 | |
| 206 | 41.7B JPY (≈$284M) | 66 | 56 | |
| 206 | 4.1B NOK (≈$393M) | 66 | 33 | |
| 206 | 544M USD | 66 | 50 | |
| 206 | 293M USD | 66 | 89 | |
| 206 | 3.9B SEK (≈$394M) | 66 | 38 | |
| 206 | 364M USD | 66 | 44 | |
| 206 | 499M USD | 66 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score