Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CorVel Corporation
How CorVel Corporation stacks up
CRVL · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #89 of 154 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CRVL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.1% vs peer median 7.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 10.3% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 16.2% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRVL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRVL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 7.1% | 10.5% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 16.2% | 11.4% | 58% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 10.3% | 11.5% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRVL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 85 | 8.9B USD | 53 | 50 | |
| 87 | 49.8B USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 87 | 31.1B USD | 52 | 65 | |
| 89 | 67.1B USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 89 | 4.2B USD | 51 | 55 | |
| 89 | 113M USD | 51 | 68 | |
| 89 | 24.1B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 93 | 2.7B USD | 49 | 63 | |
| 93 | 4.5B USD | 49 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score