Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRUS · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #86 of 1,698 · scores higher than 95% of peers · safety percentile 95
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including CRUS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.06× | 0.26× | 75% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.17 | 0.84 | 30% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 7.58× | 1.83× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 82 | 1.7B USD | 95 | 34 | |
| 83 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 9.1B TWD (≈$281M) |
| 95 |
| 65 |
| 84 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.5B) | 95 | 35 |
| 85 | 4.3B CNY (≈$600M) | 95 | 62 |
| 86 | 5.6B USD | 95 | 82 |
| 87 | 389M USD | 95 | 77 |
| 88 | 14.6B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 95 | 63 |
| 89 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 38 |
| 90 | 36.8B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 95 | 55 |