Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRK · against 121 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #98 of 122 · scores higher than 20% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CRK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 122 reported | 1.00× | 0.50× | 21% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 121 reported | 0.51 | 0.51 | 49% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 122 reported | 0.48× | 1.54× | 2% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 3 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 4 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 5 | 3.2B USD | 96 | 66 | |
| 94 | 4.6B USD | 23 | 17 | |
| 95 | 22.3B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 23 | 72 | |
| 96 | 2.2B USD | 23 | 60 | |
| 97 | 6.6B USD | 22 | 28 | |
| 98 | 4.1B USD | 22 | 56 | |
| 99 | 19.7B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 22 | 17 | |
| 100 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.7B) | 21 | 43 | |
| 101 | 23.8B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 19 | 34 | |
| 102 | 6.7B USD | 19 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score