Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Carter's, Inc.
How Carter's, Inc. stacks up
CRI · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
18/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #316 of 356 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score31 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including CRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 18?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 90% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -50.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 80% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -3.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 1.9% | 5.9% | 31% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -50.6% | 6.2% | 14% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | -3.4% | 4.1% | 16% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 312 | 1.5B USD | 19 | 22 | |
| 312 | 727M USD | 19 | 62 | |
| 312 | 3.3B USD | 19 | 61 | |
| 316 | 1.8B USD | 18 | 39 | |
| 316 | 1.1B USD | 18 | 52 | |
| 316 | 24.2B USD | 18 | 66 | |
| 319 | 1.4B USD | 17 | 19 | |
| 319 | 423M USD | 17 | 33 | |
| 321 | 766M USD | 16 | 16 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score